Husband and wife got married in Pakistan. They took up residence in Fremont, California and a child was born in California. Wife then took child to Pakistan for a vacation, and decided not to come back. For the next six years the parties battled it out in the courts and around the world. Let the fireworks begin!
According to the Court of Appeals:
The actual legal questions in the opinion prove to be straightforward. The issue on appeal [is] one of jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). (Fam. Code, § 3400 et seq.) The court concludes the well reasoned decision of the trial court was correct: the California court that dissolved the marriage had initial home state jurisdiction. California was the original forum to resolve custody and visitation disputes because the child was born in California, and was a resident of California. The California court issued an order giving custody to Husband, and California never lost jurisdiction. Its order granting custody to Husband was valid when entered and remains valid despite Wife's globe-trotting with the child.
This case is a clear demonstration of the old adage "the means don't justify the end." Click here for a whopper of a child custody tale.
Please be sure to visit www.hardinglaw.com, the website for the law firm of Harding & Associates, for more information on California family law.

Comments